She asked a guest, this blogger missed the name of....sorry....my erro....about
who is winning the "debate about Gitmo....FORMER VP Dick Cheney or CURRENT President Barack Obama"? The guest said....."Why Dick Cheney, of course." COME ON! And what did Andrea Mitchell say?
.....
After months of Republican apologies for the mess that they created in
this administration and he wants to say that Cheney's distortion of the
Geneva Convention and our Constitional laws about cruel and unusual
punishment are not good for the security of our country? He was only
in office for eight years. We survived with the Constitition for well over a hundred years and the Geneva Conventions were signed in 1949. Why
didn't she challenge him on this obvious attempt to shill for a man desperately
trying to prevent his rightful war crimes arrest? And who the HECK said that
it was a DEBATE? A debate involves two persons or teams facing each other with one or more judges to determine who has the most plausible facts on their
side of the arguement.
Last of all.....who the HECK told Cheney that we are compelled to adhere to
the policies that HE set up under the Bush administration? It's not like Bush
didn't chose to ignore arrangements made by the Clinton administration. He
is no longer in office. THANK GOD. He apparently didn't catch on to the limitations for the office of VP when he was one and now he apparently thinks
that this allows him to dictate to whoever occupies the Oval office, which makes you wonder how much he ordered Bush around, possibly. The VP is the tiebreaker of Senate votes and they are the person who attends the funerals of dignitaries. They are NOT elected to run ramshod over others. Somebody needs to explain term limits to Cheney and they need to remind Andrea Mitchell that she is obliged to at least pretend to be objective and interested in considering the truth instead of politicizing the news. Come on....you can do better than this Andrea!
No comments:
Post a Comment